Policies of Practice 1. One of Mr. Kamori's policies is to coordinate appropriately contradictory interests among relevant parties. In connection with even those matters in which documentation constitutes a major part, Mr. Kamori has settled the relevant disputes relating to transactions or other matters in a manner acceptable to the client, by being involved in negotiations among relevant parties if and when such negotiations have been deadlocked. 2. In connection with matters which are not able to be resolved by already-known transaction structures or legal theories, Mr. Kamori, together with his colleagues, always attempts to lead the relevant client to a direction favorable to such client by establishing unprecedented transaction structures or judicial judgments/decisions by means of our newly-created, sophisticated theories and persistent spirit of inquiry. An example demonstrating such policy is that Mr. Kamori conceived the transaction structure of securitization of consumer finance loans by taking advantage of a trust, as referred to in clause (3) of the "Securitization" section of the "Areas of Practice" above. Mr. Kamori is currently attempting to conceive lawful methods of defending the relevant target company from unfriendly takeovers (including rights agreements for the purpose of poison pills being lawfully adopted under Japanese law) and lawful methods of unfriendly takeovers, under Japanese law. 3. Mr. Kamori's duties include his, together with his colleagues, acting as counsel to not only companies but also directors/officers of companies intending to conduct management buyouts, boards of directors taking a stand against shareholders, and individual directors/officers taking a stand against shareholders and other directors/officers. In addition, we represent individuals principally in the fields of law referred to in the section of "Areas of Practice" hereinabove. Page Top